War and Peace

Sunday was cold and rainy, a foretaste of soon-to-arrive winter, but this morning is almost perfect. The sun is out, a few clouds dapple the sky, the temp is 12C/54F- what could be better for a walk into town along the water? From my place I can take the quick way along Esquimault Rd or dawdle via the Songhees walkway. I like to dawdle. It's not just that Songhees is winding that makes it slower. It's just about impossible not to stop and sit on a bench for a while and watch the harbour sights, so if I'm in a hurry it's not the way to go.
A little drama: a flock of gulls foraging right about where a twin otter was landing. I'm not sure if they all got away. What were they finding in that particular patch of water that made them so reluctant to abandon it? We humans are so wrapped up in our own daily concerns that we tend to forget about the other critters who also get caught up in their daily concerns. That means obeying the demands of the belly. For seagulls, unable to store up provisions for the future beyond the capacity of its belly, as soon as one feeding is done, the next is sought. Urgently. The needs of Safety are always in tension with the need to eat.
We humans have devised ways of storage and distribution that would require a catastrophic and global disruption over a long period of time to thwart. Hunger and deprivation are no longer technical problems, but a really inept and corrupt political structure can do more to disrupt our well-being than all but the worst natural disasters. As examples in recent history I would cite the Marxist- inspired regimes in Russia and China. Stalin's collectivization program in the Ukraine, for millennia one of the breadbaskets of the world, resulted in millions of Ukrainians dying of starvation. Mao, not to be outdone, presided over the deaths of tens of millions of his countrymen. Nowadays we can readily see what Mugabe has done to Zimbabwe. Once the breadbasket of Africa, the country is starving. It looks like Hugo Chavez has ambitions to follow these examples, starting with a campaign against the investors who finance the Venezuelan oil industry.
In our western system of private property and personal innovation, where individuals reciprocally offer up their services to others, it is possible for an individual as low down in the economic order as me to live within a five minute walk of a pleasant waterway and know that my little economic contribution is enough to provide me with comfortable shelter, good food, and security. Capitalism and free enterprise are wonderful ideas. I also am glad that I live in a political culture that tolerates divergent ways of thinking with differences decided through open debate. People forget the most important aspect of freedom of debate: I have a right to be wrong and you have a right to correct me on it. This is how we learn from each other.
We Anglo Americans have lived so long in this system that we take it for granted. We live in such peaceful and prosperous circumstances for so long that we have difficulty with the idea that some people in the world hate us and want to destroy our way of life. But if you pay attention then you will know that the Marxist inspired movements have worked tirelessly against us for nearly a century. Aided and financed by the Soviet and Maoist slave states, they have done a lot of damage. The Marxists have not gone away, they live and breed on campuses all across the continent. They are joined now by the Islamists, a much older scourge with a far deeper hatred than the Soviets had. At least some aspects of western culture were valued in Soviet Russia, and even Maoist China. They may have hated traditional religion but they cultivated many of the western inspired arts. But the Islamists hate everything about us. They hate our belief in freedom of expression. They hate our belief in equal rights before the law. Democracy to them is foolishness. Emancipation of women is lunacy to them. It hasn't been easy for westerners to learn how to live together while respecting different ways, creeds and languages but we have done it. Precariously, perhaps, and always under pressure, but we have done it. Islam proclaims itself the only possible and permissible creed. Every single human on the face of the planet must submit to that creed, either as a full-fledged member or as a lower class being with no rights to protection from the law.
Because of our inexperience with people who hate us just because they hate us and have no compunction against killing us, we have a hard time understanding that there are times when we have to defend ourselves, and that means war. That means a generation or more of young people who will not have the privilege of walking along the Songhees shore without a care in the world. There are a lot of people who refuse to believe that we are in danger. They think that if we stop fighting then we will have peace. Au contraire, mes amis. The reason we have peace now is that we have had generations of citizens willing to fight to preserve our peace.
Wake up, folks

America

The default attitude of many Canadians to the United States is a craven, sanctimonious, poorly thought out hostility. The higher one climbs in our cultural strata the more pronounced becomes this peculiar type of ignorance, but in just about any bar conversation if something about our southern neighbor comes up the usual snide and knowing remarks will be made. Their military is too big. They want to rule the world. They have an empire. This from people who have a pretty dim idea of geography and history. Canadians do have reasons to be annoyed at Americans regarding certain issues: the ongoing softwood lumber farce, for instance, where powerful lumber interests in the U.S. try to protect their business from Canadian competition. This has had the opposite affect from what they had hoped as the duties and levies imposed on Canadian producers have motivated them to increase efficiency and productivity to keep costs down. Thus Canadian mills are just that much more competitive than they were before. Other similar issues go back to the influence local American politics has on Congressional power brokering. But this is not what Canadians usually think of when they think of the perfidious Americans. Most Canadians don't even know about these disputes where the issues are complex and hard to understand. Does Canada subsidize lumber companies as the American lobby insists? It depends on what you call a subsidy, among other things, and as the arguments unfold their complexity quickly leaves the average interested citizen in a state of perplexity. The perception that we are being bullied is a strong one, but what does that mean? To me it's not so much an indication of American power as Canadian weakness. We have allowed ourselves to become a wimpy nation. Americans play hardball, they expect us to play that way, too. If we don't fight back they lose respect for us. It's also true that they have legitimate trade grievances with us. I'm thinking of all the marketing boards that hurt the Canadian consumer far more than they hurt the Americans. But we can hardly criticize American protectionism if we practise it ourselves.
But I would like to say more about the idiotic notion that Americans want to rule the world. Far from it. The United States may dominate the world in many ways but it is not an empire as many writers claim. If what they have is an empire then we'll have to think up another name for what the Romans, the Persians, the Assyrians, the Greeks, the English and many others have had in recorded history. That's where the dominant power completely takes over another territory, loots it, settles it, occupies it, takes slaves and rules it. Like what the Romans did to Gaul, Palestine, Egypt, Asia Minor, North Africa, Spain, Britain, etc. If the Americans wanted to rule the world would Castro still be doddering along after a half century of being a damned nuisance to the Americans even forgetting what a curse he's been to his own people.
The vast majority of Americans not only don't want an empire, they would rather stay at home and ignore the rest of the world. They did not want to involve themselves in either world wars. But after Pearl Harbor they had to face the fact that the oceans were no longer a sufficient barrier to protect them from foreign agression. Since then they have managed to defeat a major totalitarian threat without going to all out war, and now they are fraced with another enemy that may even more dangerous. Just as in the past there are powerful currents of opinion that want to deny the obvious and so we will probably have to face another 9/11, and it could be far worse now that this hostile force senses weakness in the object of its hatred.
The stupidest of conventional wisdoms is that Americans invaded Iraq for the oil. These people can't believe George Bush when he says he wants to bring freedom to Iraqis. But there are all sorts of ways Americans could isolate themselves from the consequences of a disruption in the Middle East oil supply. The United States has the scientific resources to make the adjustment and Americans would be willing to undergo any temporary inconvenience. It's Europe that would be in trouble. That's where Americans have a responsibility as the foremost world power of our time to use its power to ensure the free movement of goods and services across the globe. In the old days it was called freedom of the seas. It has always been one of the first things a rising power has always wanted to establish. That was what the Punic wars were about in Roman times. And the first projection of military power to foreign shores made by the newly minted United States under Thomas Jefferson was to subdue the Barbary Pirates of North Africa. At that time these pirates roamed all over the eastern Atlantic taking slaves and disrupting trade. For some reason the Europeans wouldn't help themselves, even though whole villages were carried off.
It was after the Romans defeated the Carthaginians that the Mediterranean became known as a Roman Lake. It was the only time in history that the whole Mediterranean basin was brought under one law and it ushered in a golden age of prosperity and cultural cross fertilization. It may be that a Roman Governor authorized the execution of a certain Judean holy man, but without the ability to freely travel as a Roman citizen St. Paul wouldn't have been able to spread Jesus' message.
Now we are potentially on the cusp of a new golden age and if so it will be due to the Americans. Americans don't want empire but they do want to spread their message: freedom. Freedom of religion, freedom of the marketplace, freedom to choose who will make the laws, freedom of speech, freedom of debate. Additionally, in the American way of thinking happiness is a good thing, a rich and rewarding life is something that everyone is entitled to provided he can take up the challenge. Empire is not an aspiration of the American people. They do not want Iraqis, Russians, Japanese, to be
American subjects. When they defeat an enemy they help him get back on his feet, as they did with Germany and Japan, as they are trying to do in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is reality folks. It's easy to figure out.
Americans have so far in my lifetime defeated Nazis and Bolsheviks, neither of whom believed in any of the above. They are now engaged in another fight. They didn't want the previous fights and they don't want this one. It seems there are aot of people in our democratic societies who don't believe there is a deadly enemy that wants nothing more than to kill them, their families, their friends, but there is. And whether or not we go into a new golden age or a new dark age depends on the outcome of this war. I know whose side I'm on.
Incidentally I have noticed one curious thing about all my American hating countrymen. Judging by the lineups at the Victoria passport office they all want to go to the States.